Ciria et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
| PEDRO CIRIA and YOJANA PAIZ |
| CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Arthur Gerrans, James Crowley and Nicholas J. Rubino |
| 3:2023cv02796 |
| June 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/1/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2023. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2023)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, James Crowley, Arthur Gerrans, YOJANA PAIZ, Nicholas J. Rubino. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2023)
|
|
Filing 7
Proposed Summons. (Cajina, Fulvio) (Filed on 6/23/2023)
|
|
Filing 6
Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons, #2 Summons Proposed Summons, #3 Summons Proposed Summons, #4 Summons Proposed Summons)(Cajina, Fulvio) (Filed on 6/23/2023)
|
|
Filing 5
CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff s shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 7/7/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 7/7/2023. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2023)
|
|
#Electronic filing error. ONLY ONE SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED PER CASE, USE AN ATTACHMENT TO SUMMONS IF NEEDED TO LIST ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS INFORMATION [err201] This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #6 Proposed Summons filed by PEDRO CIRIA, YOJANA PAIZ (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2023)
|
|
Filing 4
Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/4/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/11/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 3
Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/21/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 2
ERRATA Corrected Civil Case Cover Sheet by PEDRO CIRIA, YOJANA PAIZ. (Cajina, Fulvio) (Filed on 6/7/2023)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18336311.). Filed byPEDRO CIRIA, YOJANA PAIZ. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cajina, Fulvio) (Filed on 6/6/2023)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
