Abdo et al v. USCIS et al
Yousef Mohammed Moham Abdo and Manal Yahya Abdulhak Al Shawesh |
USCIS, San Francisco Asylum Office, UR M. Jaddou, Tim H Kim, Matthew D Emrich and Danielle Lehman |
3:2023cv02875 |
June 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #9 Stipulation to Stay Proceedings. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023) |
Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Yousef Mohammed Moham Abdo, Manal Yahya Abdulhak Al Shawesh.. (Yasrebi, Arash) (Filed on 7/21/2023) |
Filing 10 CLERKS NOTICE Second Notice Re Consent or Declination: Plaintiff(s) consent or declination was due 6/26/2023. It was not received by the Court. Plaintiff shall file its consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge jurisdiction no later than 7/28/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2023) |
Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Stay Proceedings; [Proposed] Order filed by Matthew D Emrich, UR M. Jaddou, Tim H Kim, Danielle Lehman, San Francisco Asylum Office, USCIS. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Matthew D Emrich, UR M. Jaddou, Tim H Kim, Danielle Lehman, San Francisco Asylum Office, USCIS.. (Kurlan, Elizabeth) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Matthew D Emrich, UR M. Jaddou, Tim H Kim, Danielle Lehman, San Francisco Asylum Office, USCIS. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023) |
Filing 6 Immigration Mandamus Case Procedural Order, (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023) |
Filing 5 Civil Cover Sheet by YOUSEF MOHAMMED MOHAMM ABDO, MANAL YAHYA ABDULHAK AL SHAWESH . (Yasrebi, Arash) (Filed on 6/12/2023) |
Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/26/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Proposed Summons Attachment)(Yasrebi, Arash) (Filed on 6/11/2023) |
Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by YOUSEF MOHAMMED MOHAMM ABDO, MANAL YAHYA ABDULHAK AL SHAWESH . (Yasrebi, Arash) (Filed on 6/11/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCANDC-18349276.). Filed byMANAL YAHYA ABDULHAK AL SHAWESH, YOUSEF MOHAMMED MOHAMM ABDO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1 YOUSEF, #2 Exhibit EXHIBIT 1 MANAL)(Yasrebi, Arash) (Filed on 6/11/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.