Flournoy v. Haakenson et al
| James Henry Flournoy, Jr. |
| Paul Haakenson and Marin County Board of Supervisors |
| 3:2023cv02883 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| PSLC LLH |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by James Henry Flournoy, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service, #2 Envelope)(cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2023) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 7/20/2023. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 Disregard initial COMPLAINT see dkt 1-6 for full complaint against Paul Haakenson, Marin County Board of Supervisors. Filed by James Henry Flournoy, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit A-K, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate/Proof of Service, #5 Envelope)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/12/2023) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/14/2023: # (6) Fully Rescanned Complaint) (sfb, COURT STAFF). Modified on 6/14/2023 (sfb, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
