US Right to Know v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES
US Right to Know |
Department of Defense and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES |
3:2023cv02956 |
June 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options by Parties and Counsel (Snyder, Daniel) (Filed on 8/8/2023) |
Filing 15 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Stipulation to extend Time to Respond to Complaint filed by UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES. (Mohan, Sharanya) (Filed on 8/8/2023) |
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. Attorney General of the United States (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES served on 7/24/2023, answer due 8/23/2023. Office of the Secretary (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed (FOIA) by US Right to Know. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES served on 7/13/2023, answer due 8/14/2023. U.S. Attorney's Office (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by US Right to Know. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES served on 7/17/2023, answer due 8/7/2023. Per 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(C), Answer is Due 08/16/2023 (Doughty, Rachel) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by US Right to Know of Unavailability of Counsel (Snyder, Daniel) (Filed on 7/24/2023) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2023) |
Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 317, receipt number ACANDC-18418654.) filed by US Right to Know. (Snyder, Daniel) (Filed on 7/5/2023) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by US Right to Know.. (Rivo, Lily) (Filed on 6/20/2023) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2023) |
Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/7/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/14/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2023) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons Additional Defendants)(Rivo, Lily) (Filed on 6/15/2023) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 6/29/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2023) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by US Right to Know (Rivo, Lily) (Filed on 6/15/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number BCANDC-18365854.). Filed byUS Right to Know. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Complaint)(Rivo, Lily) (Filed on 6/15/2023) Modified on 6/16/2023 (far, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: US Right to Know v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: US Right to Know | |
Represented By: | Lily Anne Rivo |
Represented By: | Daniel C. Snyder |
Represented By: | Rachel Susanna Doughty |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Defense | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES | |
Represented By: | Sharanya Mohan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.