Aguayo v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: Frank Aguayo
Defendant: Motor Coach Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv03059
Filed: June 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan Illston
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Frank Aguayo (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Goldschmidt, Deon) (Filed on 8/18/2023)
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 6/30/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
June 30, 2023 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
June 30, 2023 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Motor Coach Industries, Inc... (Song, Jianlin) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
June 30, 2023 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE AND CLERK'S NOTICE ON REASSIGNMENT. Counsel are instructed to read the attached pdf. MANDATORY ZOOM REGISTRATION: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 9/27/2023 at 2 pm. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023)
June 22, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/18/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/25/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2023)
June 22, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/6/2023. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2023)
June 22, 2023 COUNSEL FOLLOW UP ACTION NEEDED. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Motor Coach Industries, Inc. Counsel for both Plaintiff and Defendant have been added to the case docket for electronic notification. Per Civil Local 11-1, our records there are counsel on the case that have not yet been admitted to practice in the Northern District of California. Please submit a Petition for Admission. Please see our #Admission page for more information (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/22/2023)
June 21, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Motor Coach Industries, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Motor Coach Industries, Inc., Corporate Parent Motor Coach Industries International, Inc. for Motor Coach Industries, Inc.. (Song, Jianlin) (Filed on 6/21/2023)
June 21, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 22CV013419. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18380898). Filed byMotor Coach Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Song, Jianlin) (Filed on 6/21/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aguayo v. Motor Coach Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank Aguayo
Represented By: Deon Goldschmidt
Represented By: Kevin M Retoriano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Motor Coach Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Jianlin Song
Represented By: Naina Singh
Represented By: Morrietta Kandakai Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?