Richard v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
| Jacquese Richard |
| C.R. Bard, Inc., Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company and DOES 1 through 10, |
| 3:2023cv03147 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan Illston |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-1) by MDL Panel on 8/18/2023. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023) |
| Case transferred to the District of Arizona. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023) |
| Filing 10 INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT GUIDELINE AND CLERK'S NOTICE ON REASSIGNMENT: Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/29/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2023 at 02:30 PM - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Counsel are instructed to review the attached pdf. MANDATORY ZOOM REGISTRATION: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at sicrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 9/27/2023 at 2 pm.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/si General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. Case Management Statement due by 9/29/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2023 02:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. (ec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 7/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2023)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jacquese Richard.. (Jasnoch, John) (Filed on 7/19/2023) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 7/31/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/17/2023) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2023) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/29/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/6/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/10/2023. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Jasnoch, John) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT; Demand for Jury Trial against Bard Access Systems, Inc., Becton, Dickinson and Company, C.R. Bard, Inc., DOES 1 through 10, (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18393382.). Filed by Jacquese Richard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Jasnoch, John) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
