Central Garden & Pet Company et al v. Leetronics Corporation et al
| Central Garden & Pet Company and Farnam Companies, Inc. |
| Leetronics Corporation, Eliran Yadid and John Does 1-10, individually or as corporations/business entities |
| 3:2023cv03157 |
| June 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendants Leetronics Corporation and Eliran Yadid. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) #10 )(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2023) |
| Filing 10 Request for Entry of Default filed by Central Garden & Pet Company, Farnam Companies, Inc. (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 8/1/2023) Modified on 8/2/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Central Garden & Pet Company, Farnam Companies, Inc. (as to Defendant Eliran Yadid) (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 8/1/2023) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Central Garden & Pet Company, Farnam Companies, Inc. (as to Defendant Leetronics Corporation) (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 8/1/2023) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Leetronics Corporation, Eliran Yadid. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2023) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/5/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2023) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Central Garden & Pet Company, Farnam Companies, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Central Garden & Pet Company, Other Affiliate Farnam Companies, Inc. for Central Garden & Pet Company. (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 6/28/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/11/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2023) |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Patent or Trademark Infringement (cc: form mailed to register). (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages, Injunctive, and Other Relief; Demand for Jury Trial against Leetronics Corporation, Eliran Yadid (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18394926.). Filed by Central Garden & Pet Company, Farnam Companies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Micheil, Shane) (Filed on 6/26/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
