Gil Tzun v. Allison et al
| Armando Gil Tzun |
| Kathleen Allison, Ronald Broomfield, Katherine Mason, Jennifer Lopez and Karen Hlavaty |
| 3:2023cv03258 |
| June 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE SCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ON REASSIGNMENT: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/26/2023 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 10/19/2023. Parties may download Judge Alsup's standing orders from the Court's web page: https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/alsup-william-wha/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2023) |
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 8/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2023)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2023) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Kathleen Allison, Ronald Broomfield, Karen Hlavaty, Jennifer Lopez, Katherine Mason.. (Wilson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/18/2023) |
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/31/2023. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2023) |
| Filing 12 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byKathleen Allison, Ronald Broomfield, Karen Hlavaty, Jennifer Lopez, Katherine Mason. (Wilson, Matthew) (Filed on 8/16/2023) |
| Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Katherine Mason on July 17, 2023, filed by Armando Gil Tzun. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Karen Hlavaty on July 17, 2023, filed by Armando Gil Tzun. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Jennifer Lopez on July 17, 2023, filed by Armando Gil Tzun. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Kathleen Allison on July 14, 2023, filed by Armando Gil Tzun. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Defendant Ronald Broomfield on July 14, 2023, filed by Armando Gil Tzun. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Armando Gil Tzun.. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/12/2023) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kathleen Allison, Ronald Broomfield, Karen Hlavaty, Jennifer Lopez, Katherine Mason. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2023) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Brown, Donald) (Filed on 7/11/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/11/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/18/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/14/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/30/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18409339.). Filed byArmando Gil Tzun. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Donald) (Filed on 6/29/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
