Ma v. Twitter, Inc. et al
| Fabien Ho Ching Ma |
| Twitter, Inc. and X Corp. |
| 3:2023cv03301 |
| July 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Expedite HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Fabien Ho Ching Ma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Compel ARBITRATION AND FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Fabien Ho Ching Ma. Motion Hearing set for 10/2/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Responses due by 9/14/2023. Replies due by 9/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Proposed Order)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED PETITION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION against Twitter, Inc., X Corp.. Filed byFabien Ho Ching Ma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fabien Ho Ching Ma.. (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 8/1/2023) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Petitioner shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 8/1/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/1/2023. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 9/25/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/2/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (jrs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/17/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2023) |
| Filing 1 PETITION to Compel Arbitration (No Process) against Twitter, Inc., X Corp. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18414944). Filed byFabien Ho Ching Ma. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 7/3/2023) Modified on 7/7/2023 (jrs, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
