Gold v. California Highway Patrol et al
Liza Gold |
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, Christopher Weaver, Owen Rogers Cho, Owen Rogers and Kristin Cho |
3:2023cv03414 |
July 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
James Donato |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by California Highway Patrol, Kristin Cho, Christopher Weaver. (Kodical, Rohit) (Filed on 8/25/2023) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Amended Complaint byCalifornia Highway Patrol, Kristin Cho, Christopher Weaver. (Kodical, Rohit) (Filed on 8/23/2023) |
Filing 15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against California Highway Patrol, Kristin Cho, Owen Rogers, Christopher Weaver. Filed byLiza Gold. (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 8/11/2023) |
#Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed. Re: #13 Certificate of Service filed by Liza Gold, #12 Certificate of Service filed by Liza Gold, #14 Certificate of Service filed by Liza Gold, #11 Certificate of Service filed by Liza Gold (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2023) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Liza Gold re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 8/2/2023) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Liza Gold re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 8/2/2023) |
Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Liza Gold re #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons, #11 Certificate of Service (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 8/2/2023) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Liza Gold re 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Summons (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 8/2/2023) |
Filing 10 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/12/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 10/5/2023. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/24/2023. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2023) |
Filing 9 Case REASSIGNED to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. Reassignment Order singed by Clerk on 7/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2023) |
Filing 8 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2023) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jhf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Liza Gold.. (Walker, Walter) (Filed on 7/20/2023) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to California Highway Patrol, Kristin Cho, Owen Rogers, Christopher Weaver. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/3/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 10/10/2023 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 7/24/2023. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Walter Herbert Walker, III. The party information for Defendant Rogers and Cho has been modified for the following reason: party name for Rogers was entered incorrectly, Cho's name was omitted from the docket. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2023) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Walker, Walter) (Filed on 7/7/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18431128.). Filed byLiza Gold. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Walker, Walter) (Filed on 7/7/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.