Nguyen v. Asana, Inc.
| Michael Nguyen |
| Asana, Inc., Christopher Farinacci and Anna Binder |
| 3:2023cv03683 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Trina L Thompson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 Summons Issued as to Asana, Inc., Anna Binder, Christopher Farinacci. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| Filing 25 Proposed Summons. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| Filing 24 Proposed Summons. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| Filing 23 Proposed Summons. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| Filing 22 ***Filing Error. Disregard. Incorrect Event Used.***AMENDED COMPLAINT Proposed Summon, Anna Binder against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Nguyen. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) Modified on 9/21/2023 (krp, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 21 ***Filing Error. Disregard. Incorrect Event Used.***AMENDED COMPLAINT Proposed Summons, C. Farinacci against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Nguyen. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) Modified on 9/21/2023 (krp, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 20 ***Filing Error. Disregard. Incorrect Event Used.***AMENDED COMPLAINT Proposed Summons, Asana Inc. against All Defendants. Filed byMichael Nguyen. (Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/21/2023) Modified on 9/21/2023 (krp, COURT STAFF). |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101] Please re-file Docket Entries #20 , #21 , and #22 as "Proposed Summons". ***Within ECF, Select: Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Proposed Summons*** The court discourages the use of multiple summonses, but if they are used, they should be uploaded as a single PDF document. Re: #22 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Nguyen, #21 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Nguyen, #20 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Nguyen (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. The summons should be uploaded separately and not as part of, or as an attachment to, the complaint or other initiating documents. The court discourages the use of multiple summonses, but if they are used, they should be uploaded as a single PDF document. Please re-file as Proposed Summons. Re: #19 Amended Complaint filed by Michael Nguyen (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2023) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants. Filed by Michael Nguyen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Nguyen, Michael) (Filed on 9/18/2023). |
Filing 18
ORDER GRANTING ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION The Court advises Plaintiff that assistance is available through the Legal Help Center. The Help Center website is available at https://cand.uscourts.gov/legal-help. Plaintiff may also file a separate case management statement that is due no later than November 2, 2023. Signed by Judge Trina L. Thompson on 9/11/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tltlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2023)
|
| Filing 17 CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompson's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/9/2023 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/2/2023. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/trina-l-thompson/General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 8/8/2023) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L Thompson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 8/8/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2023)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2023) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Asana, Inc... (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 8/8/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect event used. [err101]Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #13 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Michael Nguyen (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Substitution of Counsel by Debra Fink Bogaards (Bogaards, Debra) (Filed on 7/28/2023) Modified on 7/31/2023 (sfb, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asana, Inc. re #9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, Consenting to the Jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/27/2023) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asana, Inc. re #9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines,, 8 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Sevilla, Angelito) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asana, Inc. re #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #7 Certificate of Service, #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Certificate of Interested Entities, #2 Declaration in Support, #6 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options, #3 Declaration in Support, (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
| Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2023 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2023) |
| Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/8/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Asana, Inc. re #4 Certificate of Interested Entities, #1 Notice of Removal, #5 Certificate of Interested Entities, #2 Declaration in Support, #6 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b)of discussion of ADR options, #3 Declaration in Support, (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 6 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Asana, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Asana, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Allied World Insurance Company for Asana, Inc.. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 3 Declaration in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, Declaration of Kathleen B. Roney ISO Removal of Action to the U.S.D.C. Northern District of California filed byAsana, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 2 Declaration of Cristina Gavin in Support of #1 Notice of Removal, filed byAsana, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Related document(s) #1 ) (Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action to the U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sections 1332 and 1441 from County of San Francisco Superior Court. Their case number is CGC-23-607004. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18482384). Filed byAsana, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Roney, Kathleen) (Filed on 7/25/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
