Ramirez v. Office of the San Francisco Mayor London Nichole Breed
Elias Torres Ramirez |
Office of the San Francisco Mayor London Nichole Breed |
3:2023cv03847 |
July 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Laurel Beeler |
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Cover Letter dated 9/18/2023 from Ellis Torres Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Elias Torres Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 9/21/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Elias Torres Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023) |
Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Elias Torres Ramirez. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023) |
Filing 8 Received Documents from Elias Torres Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Document, #2 Envelope)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023) |
Filing 7 Received Document by Elias Torres Ramirez. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2023) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 8/30/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING ZOOM HEARING: Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2023 at 11:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2023. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/lb General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER: The attached notice and order notifies the plaintiff of resources available, attaches the district's handbook for litigants who do not have a lawyer, includes a flyer for contacting the court's help desk and instructs the plaintiff about serving the defendants. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 08/01/2023. (Attachments: #1 Self Help Flyer, #2 Pro Se Handbook)(ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 10/26/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/2/2023 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Elias Torres Ramirez. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Office of the San Francisco Mayor London Nichole Breed (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Elias Torres Ramirez. Consent/Declination due by 8/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ramirez v. Office of the San Francisco Mayor London Nichole Breed | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Elias Torres Ramirez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Office of the San Francisco Mayor London Nichole Breed | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.