Deita v. Bueno et al
| Christine Deita |
| George Layo Bueno, Jaycelle Ann Cabrera Bueno, Gemma Binondo, Ryan Binondo, Josephine Layo, Charlene Mae Bueno, Florencio Laylo, Jr., Nida Layo and Florencio Layo, Jr. |
| 3:2023cv03901 |
| August 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 18 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 16 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 15 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 14 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 12 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Summons name "Josephine Layo Bueno" does not match name found in complaint "Josephine Layo" Please refile the proposed summons. Re: #16 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. ONE SUMMONS FOR ALL DEFENDANTSElectronic filing error. A maximum of THREE summons will be issued. Please list all defendants on ONE summons or multiple defendant on THREE summons and re-file in its entirety Re: #9 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #12 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #10 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #15 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #14 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #8 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #11 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita, #13 Proposed Summons filed by Christine Deita (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2023) |
| Filing 11 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/26/2023) |
| Filing 10 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/26/2023) |
| Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/26/2023) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 9/26/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Christine Deita.. (Rusnak, Jennifer) (Filed on 9/12/2023) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Christine Deita shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 9/26/2023. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2023) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Deita shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 9/5/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2023) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by Christine Deita Amended. (Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 8/4/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 10/27/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/3/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom D, 15th Floor. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Civil Cover Sheet has two selected divisional assignments. Please resubmit your amended civil cover sheet with only one Section IX divisional assignment. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover Sheet Re: #1 Complaint, filed by Christine Deita (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/4/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 8/17/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/3/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Plaintiff Christine Deita against All Defendants. No process Filed by Christine Deita. Fee Paid $402 (ACANDC-18512597) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rusnak, Alexander) (Filed on 8/3/2023) Modified on 8/3/2023 (bar, COURT STAFF). Modified on 8/4/2023 (bar, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
