Johnson v. Hill et al
Jesse Johnson, Jr. |
Warden Rick M. Hill, Corr. Sergeant E. Aguilar, Corrections Lt. J. Beasley, Corrections Lt. A. Benedyuk, Corr. Officer N. Montes and Corr. Officer W. Fausel |
3:2023cv04214 |
August 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
PSLC MWD |
William H Orrick |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in Eastern District of California - Live System as case 2:23-cv-01846, filed 08/29/2023. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF TRANSFER. This federal civil rights action is TRANSFERRED to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 08/24/2023. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Jesse Johnson, Jr. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E. Aguilar, J. Beasley, A. Benedyuk, W. Fausel, Rick M. Hill, N. Montes. (No process. IFP pending) Filed by Jesse Johnson, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Complaint - Part 2, #2 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.