United States of America v. Approximately 1,360,000.748 Tether and $3,859,703.65 in U.S. Currency
| United States of America |
| APPROXIMATELY 1,360,000.748 TETHER AND $3,859,703.65 IN U.S. CURRENCY |
| 3:2023cv04400 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 10/7/23. (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 10/11/2023) |
| Filing 7 Warrant of Arrest of Property In Rem Issued as to Approximately 1,360,000.748 Tether and $3,859,703.65 in U.S. Currency. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Warrant. (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/5/2023) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by United States of America (Notice of Forfeiture Action) (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 9/5/2023) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by United States of America.. (Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 8/29/2023) |
| Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2023. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/11/2023. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2023) |
| Filing 1 Verified Complaint for Civil Forfeiture in Rem against APPROXIMATELY 1,360,000.748 TETHER AND $3,859,703.65 IN U.S. CURRENCY. Filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kaltsas, Chris) (Filed on 8/25/2023) Modified on 8/28/2023 (tn, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Approximately 1,360,000.748 Tether and $3,859,703.65 in U.S. Currency | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Chris Kaltsas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: APPROXIMATELY 1,360,000.748 TETHER AND $3,859,703.65 IN U.S. CURRENCY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
