Cross et al v. RLI Insurance Company
| Orestes Cross and Veronica O'Neill |
| RLI Insurance Company |
| 3:2023cv04427 |
| August 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Lisa J Cisneros |
| Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 4.2 by RLI Insurance Company re #14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, (Marcus, Peter) (Filed on 9/20/2023) Modified on 9/21/2023 (kmg, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 18
ORDER Granting #17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by 2/29/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/7/2024 10:00 AM.Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on September 14, 2023. (amolc1, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2023)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue #14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines; DECLARATION OF PETER J. MARCUS filed by RLI Insurance Company. (Marcus, Peter) (Filed on 9/13/2023) |
|
Filing 16
Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting #12 Motion for Extension. Response to Motion to Dismiss due November 3, 2023. Reply in support of Motion to Dismiss due November 17, 2023. Future requests to change time shall comply with Civil Local Rule 6. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amolc1, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2023)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Non-Opposition to #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, 11 Clerk's Notice, by RLI Insurance Company (Crane, Steven) (Filed on 9/11/2023) |
| Filing 14 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Case Management Statement due by 11/23/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/30/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2023) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin re #12 Motion for Extension: The Court construes the motion as an administrative motion pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-11. Defendant shall file a response by no later than noon on September 11, 2023. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on September 6, 2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amolc1, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Orestes Cross, Veronica O'Neill. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Brian P. Worthington)(Worthington, Brian) (Filed on 9/5/2023) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice re #9 Motion to Dismiss. Defendant has noticed the motion for hearing on a closed hearing date. Due to the Courts impacted calendar, the hearing is re-set to 2/1/2024 at 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. The parties may be able to obtain an earlier hearing date by consenting to a magistrate judge using the form available at: #https://http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2023). |
| Filing 10 Declaration of Brent M. Estes in Support of #9 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by RLI Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) #9 ) (Crane, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2023) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by RLI Insurance Company. Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2023 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. Responses due by 9/15/2023. Replies due by 9/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Crane, Steven) (Filed on 9/1/2023) |
| Filing 8 Certificate of Interested Entities by Orestes Cross, Veronica O'Neill (Worthington, Brian) (Filed on 9/1/2023) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Paul Worthington (Worthington, Brian) (Filed on 9/1/2023) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 8/31/23. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by RLI Insurance Company.. (Crane, Steven) (Filed on 8/30/2023) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by RLI Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent RLI Corp., Corporate Parent Vanguard Group Inc. for RLI Insurance Company. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Crane, Steven) (Filed on 8/28/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/11/2023. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL of Action Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1441(b) (Diverstiy) and Demand for Jury Trial from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is C23-01758. (Filing fee $402, receipt number ACANDC-18590840). Filed by RLI Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Crane, Steven) (Filed on 8/28/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
