Anderson v. Regional Acceptance Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Dayna Anderson
Defendant: Regional Acceptance Corporation and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv04440
Filed: August 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2023 Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (De Mello, Luana) (Filed on 10/20/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 15 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint, Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Regional Acceptance Corporation. (McGill, Brenna) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 19, 2023 Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Central Source LLC, Corporate Parent Online Data Exchange LLC, Corporate Parent New Management Services LLC, Corporate Parent VantageScore Solutions LLC, Corporate Parent Opt-Out Services LLC for Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (De Mello, Luana) (Filed on 9/19/2023)
September 19, 2023 #Electronic filing error re: #13 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Filer did not add all interested parties when prompted. Re-file this document in its entirety and when prompted, enter all affiliates or corporate parents. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2023)
September 15, 2023 Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (De Mello, Luana) (Filed on 9/15/2023)
September 15, 2023 Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond re #1 Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (De Mello, Luana) (Filed on 9/15/2023)
September 12, 2023 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dayna Anderson. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 8/30/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (Wagner, Elizabeth) (Filed on 9/12/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dayna Anderson. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. served on 8/31/2023, answer due 9/21/2023. (Loker, Matthew) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Regional Acceptance Corporation. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/24/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/1/2023 at 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor.Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Ann Wagner (Wagner, Elizabeth) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 28, 2023 Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Dayna Anderson (Loker, Matthew) (Filed on 8/28/2023)
August 28, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Loker, Matthew) (Filed on 8/28/2023)
August 28, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Loker, Matthew) (Filed on 8/28/2023)
August 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Regional Acceptance Corporation ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18594047.). Filed byDayna Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Loker, Matthew) (Filed on 8/28/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Anderson v. Regional Acceptance Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dayna Anderson
Represented By: Matthew Michael Loker
Represented By: Elizabeth Ann Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regional Acceptance Corporation
Represented By: Brenna Jean McGill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Cheryl L. O'Connor
Represented By: Luana De Mello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?