Rodrigues et al v. General Motors LLC
| Annette Rodrigues and Charles Smith |
| General Motors LLC |
| 3:2023cv04488 |
| August 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William Alsup |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven D. Park (Park, Steven) (Filed on 10/27/2023) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Appearance by Vincent Frank Tremonti, II (Tremonti, Vincent) (Filed on 10/27/2023) |
| Filing 24 OBJECTIONS to re #22 Opposition/Response to Motion,, EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS AND MOTION TO STRIKE INADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE RELIED UPON BY DEFENDANT IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND ACTION by Annette Rodrigues. (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 23 REPLY (re #18 MOTION to Remand TO STATE COURT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF RYAN K. MARDEN ) PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR AN ORDER REMANDING ACTION filed byAnnette Rodrigues. (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 22 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #18 MOTION to Remand TO STATE COURT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF RYAN K. MARDEN ) filed byGeneral Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Peter A. Strotz in Support of General Motors' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court, #2 Exhibit A - Lease Agreement, #3 Exhibit 2 - Declaration of Timothy M. Kuhn in Support of General Motors' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand to State Court, #4 Exhibit 3 - Kuehl (Dkt 14) Joint Rule 26(f)Report)(Strotz, Peter) (Filed on 10/5/2023) |
| Filing 21 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Memorandum of Points and Authorities ) PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS filed byAnnette Rodrigues. (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 10/3/2023) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE by General Motors LLC re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [Non Opposition of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss] (Strotz, Peter) (Filed on 10/2/2023) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE by Annette Rodrigues Certification and Notice of Interested Parties (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 9/26/2023) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Remand TO STATE COURT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION OF RYAN K. MARDEN filed by Annette Rodrigues. Motion Hearing set for 11/2/2023 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor before Judge William Alsup. Responses due by 10/27/2023. Replies due by 11/3/2023. (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 9/21/2023) |
| Filing 17 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT AND HEARING RE: #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FROM 11/16/2023 TO 12/14/2023 AT 8:00AM: Initial Case Management Conference and Motion Hearing re: #8 Motion to Dismiss is RESCHEDULED for 12/14/2023 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/7/2023. Motion briefing deadlines remain unchanged. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2023) Modified on 9/21/2023 (afm, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Counsel and Notice of Interested Parties by Ryan K. Marden on behalf of Annette Rodrigues (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 9/20/2023) |
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING RE: #8 MOTION TO DISMISS ON REASSIGNMENT: Motion hearing as to #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Memorandum of Points and Authorities and Initial Case Management Conference RESCHEDULED for 11/16/2023 08:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/9/2023. Parties may download Judge Alsup's standing orders from the Court's web page: https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/alsup-william-wha/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(afm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2023) |
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William Alsup for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 09/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2023)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Annette Rodrigues.. (Marden, Ryan) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 9/18/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2023) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by General Motors LLC.. (Strotz, Peter) (Filed on 9/11/2023) |
| Filing 9 Request for Judicial Notice re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed byGeneral Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) #8 ) (Strotz, Peter) (Filed on 9/11/2023) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by General Motors LLC. Motion Hearing set for 10/19/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Responses due by 9/25/2023. Replies due by 10/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Peter A. Strotz in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint, #2 Errata A, #3 Proposed Order)(Strotz, Peter) (Filed on 9/11/2023) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/30/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/7/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (hdj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by General Motors LLC re #1 Notice of Removal,, #3 Certificate of Interested Entities, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Priestley, Brian) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/14/2023. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet by General Motors LLC . (Priestley, Brian) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error.Use Current Civil Cover Sheet. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by General Motors LLC (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023) |
| Filing 3 Certificate of Interested Entities by General Motors LLC identifying Other Affiliate General Motors Company, Other Affiliate General Motors Holdings LLC for General Motors LLC. (Priestley, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2023) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by General Motors LLC identifying Other Affiliate General Motors Company, Other Affiliate General Motors Holdings LLC for General Motors LLC. (Priestley, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Their case number is C23-02046. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18602814). Filed byGeneral Motors LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Pleadings, #3 Declaration of Timothy Kuhn, #4 Exhibit A to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #5 Exhibit B to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #6 Exhibit C to Timothy Kuhn Declaration, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Priestley, Brian) (Filed on 8/30/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
