Monarch Blockchain Corporation v. Wyre Payments, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Monarch Blockchain Corporation
Defendant: Wyre Payments, Inc. and Ioannis Giannaros
Case Number: 3:2023cv04490
Filed: August 30, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 26, 2023 Filing 13 Clerk's Notice ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Wyre Payments, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Related documents(s) #12 )(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2023)
October 19, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION for Entry of Default against Wyre Payments, Inc. filed by Monarch Blockchain Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 10/19/2023)
October 19, 2023 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monarch Blockchain Corporation. Wyre Payments, Inc. served on 9/27/2023, answer due 10/18/2023. (Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 10/19/2023) Modified on 10/20/2023 (slh, COURT STAFF).
September 6, 2023 Filing 10 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Joint Case Management Statement due by 12/1/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/8/2023 at 10:00 AM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Friday, December 1, 2023, by no later than 12:00PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 7 CERTIFICATION OF CONFLICTS AND INTERESTED ENTITIES OR PERSON filed by Monarch Blockchain Corporation (Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
September 6, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Monarch Blockchain Corporation.. (Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 9/6/2023)
August 31, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Ioannis Giannaros, Wyre Payments, Inc.. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023)
August 31, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Joint Case Management Statement due by 11/27/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/4/2023 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023)
August 31, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/14/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2023)
August 30, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 8/30/2023)
August 30, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR 1. VIOLATION OF 26 U.S.C. 7434 2. FRAUD; AND 3. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against All Defendants, (Filing Fee: $402.00, receipt number ACANDC-18601098). Filed by Monarch Blockchain Corporation. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Cover Sheet)(Gesund, Keren) (Filed on 8/30/2023) Modified on 8/31/2023 (tn, COURT STAFF).
August 30, 2023 #Electronic filing error. *PLEASE DISREGARD, NATURE OF SUIT CORRECT ON COVER SHEET* Nature of Suit on civil cover sheet does not match the one chosen in ecf. No judge assignment will be made until the document is e-filed. Submit your document using Civil Events > Other Filings > Other Documents > Civil Cover SheetThis filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Re: #1 Complaint filed by Monarch Blockchain Corporation (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2023) Modified on 8/31/2023 (ark, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Monarch Blockchain Corporation v. Wyre Payments, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monarch Blockchain Corporation
Represented By: Keren E. Gesund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wyre Payments, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ioannis Giannaros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?