DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al
| DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. |
| Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland |
| 3:2023cv04743 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| William H Orrick |
| Miller Act |
| 40 U.S.C. ยง 270 Miller Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. re #1 Complaint, (Spencer, Daniel) (Filed on 11/7/2023) |
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 11/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David William Smiley (Smiley, David) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc... (Spencer, Daniel) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Patriot Construction. (Ruiz, Stephen) (Filed on 10/30/2023) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/3/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc., DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. re #1 Complaint, #4 Summons Issued (Spencer, Daniel) (Filed on 10/12/2023) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 10/13/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/13/2023. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Patriot Construction. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2023) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/11/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/18/2023 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/28/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Patriot Construction ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18645968.). Filed byDMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certification of Conflicts and Interested Entities or Persons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Spencer, Daniel) (Filed on 9/14/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
