Roy v. Salesforce, Inc.
| Lisabeth Roy and Dr. Lisbeth W. Roy |
| Salesforce.Com.Inc, Salesforce, Inc., Salesforce.com Inc, force.com, work.com, Vaccine Cloud and Salesforce care |
| 3:2023cv04764 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
| Filing 15 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Salesforce, Inc... (Zuber, Jeffrey) (Filed on 11/9/2023) |
| Filing 14 SECOND CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/13/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting #9 Stipulation. Response deadline extended to 11/15/2023. If Defendant files a motion, Plaintiff's deadline to respond is extended to 12/13/2023. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/2/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Signed by The Clerk on 10/19/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF RECUSAL, Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 10/19/2023. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO OPPOSE A RESPONSIVE MOTION; DECL OF COURTNEY STUART-ALBAN filed by Lisbeth W. Roy. (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 10/16/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lisbeth W. Roy.. (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lisbeth W. Roy (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 9/28/2023) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Lisabeth Roy. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/12/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2023 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Lisabeth Roy . (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Electronic Filing Error. Civil Cover Sheet missing. Randomly assigning case to judge will not take place until Completed Civil Cover has been filed. Please complete Civil Cover Sheet Rev. 10/20 and file as a separate docket entry Re: #1 Complaint filed by Lisabeth Roy (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/29/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Salesforce, Inc. Filed by Lisabeth Roy. (Alban, Juan) (Filed on 9/15/2023) (Filing Fee paid $402.00, Tracking ID CANDC-18648773) Modified text on 9/18/2023, to conform with document posted by counsel. (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/18/2023 (bw, COURT STAFF). Modified on 10/19/2023 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
