Solarjuice American, Inc. v. TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff: Solarjuice American, Inc.
Defendant: TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv04869
Filed: September 22, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Vince Chhabria
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2023 Filing 18 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on November 17, 2023. (vclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2023)
November 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on November 16, 2023. (vclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2023)
November 14, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE VACATING 11/16/2023 MOTION HEARING RE #4 Motion to Dismiss.The Court will issue a written ruling based on the motion and responsive briefs. The #15 stipulation to appear remotely is denied as moot. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2023)
November 6, 2023 Filing 15 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Solarjuice American, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Hodroff, Matthew) (Filed on 11/6/2023)
October 23, 2023 Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE RE #12 . #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Hearing set for 11/16/2023 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2023)
October 20, 2023 Filing 13 REPLY (re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) filed byTX-Morrow Construction, Inc.. (Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 10/20/2023)
October 16, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE by TX-Morrow Construction, Inc. re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 10/16/2023)
October 16, 2023 Filing 11 * ERRONEOUS ENTRY. PLEAASE DISREGARD. * MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 04, 17th Floor before Judge Vince Chhabria. Responses due by 10/30/2023. Replies due by 11/6/2023. (Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 10/16/2023) Modified on 10/16/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF).
October 13, 2023 Filing 10 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction ) filed bySolarjuice American, Inc.. (Hodroff, Matthew) (Filed on 10/13/2023)
October 13, 2023 Filing 9 REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Vince Chhabria upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chhabria's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing according to Judge Chhabria's available dates, which are listed on his webpage under the section "Scheduling Notes." The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/5/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2024 at 10:00 AM by Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/vc Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. One list of names of all counsel appearing for all parties must be sent in one email to the CRD at vccrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than Friday, January 5, 2024, by no later than 12:00PM.General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(bxs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2023)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 10/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2023)
October 12, 2023 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023)
October 11, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by TX-Morrow Construction, Inc... (Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 10/11/2023)
October 2, 2023 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 10/10/2023. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2023)
September 29, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 11/16/2023 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Responses due by 10/13/2023. Replies due by 10/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeffrey Green ISO MTD, #2 Supplement Granting MTD)(Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 9/29/2023)
September 25, 2023 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2024 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2023)
September 25, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/10/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2023)
September 25, 2023 #Electronic filing error. The following errors have been corrected in the case opening screen. (1) Jurisdiction has been corrected to (4) Diversity. (2) Jury Demand has been corrected to 'X No'. (3) Origin has been corrected to '2 Removal from State Court'. Filer is reminded that information entered in the case opening screen should match that in the Civil Cover Sheet. Corrected by Clerk's Office. No further action is necessary. Re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by TX-Morrow Construction, Inc. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2023)
September 22, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 23CV038605. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18672646). Filed byTX-Morrow Construction, Inc. Copy of Complaint attached. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Declaration)(Goodman, Helen) (Filed on 9/22/2023) Modified on 9/25/2023 (mcl, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Solarjuice American, Inc. v. TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Solarjuice American, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Bradley Hodroff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TX-Morrow Construction, Inc.
Represented By: Helen Goodman
Represented By: Meryl Macklin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?