Watson v. City of Arcata et al
| Brett Watson |
| City of Arcata and Karen Diemer |
| 3:2023cv05013 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Robert M Illman |
| Trina L Thompson |
| American with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Brett Watson. (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 11/24/2023) |
| Filing 19 REPLY (re #10 MOTION to Dismiss ) PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(B)(6) AND NOTICE OF NON-RECEIPT OF PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION filed byCity of Arcata, Karen Diemer. (Fox, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/24/2023) |
| Filing 18 Proposed Order re #10 MOTION to Dismiss by City of Arcata, Karen Diemer. (Bryans, Natalie) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE by City of Arcata, Karen Diemer re #10 MOTION to Dismiss SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS CITY OF ARCATA AND KAREN DIEMERS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS (Fox, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/15/2023) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines re #17 Notice re #10 MOTION to Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 3/12/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor before Judge Trina L Thompson. (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 11/15/2023) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Natalie Bryans (Bryans, Natalie) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by City of Arcata, Karen Diemer re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Notice (Fox, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 14 CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Trina L. Thompson upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Thompson's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing according to Judge Thompson's available dates, dates of unavailability are listed on her webpage under the section "Scheduling Notes." The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/1/2024 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/25/2024. Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/trina-l-thompson/General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L Thompson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 11/03/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Brett Watson.. (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 11/2/2023) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Arcata, Karen Diemer. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 12/19/2023 11:00 AM. Responses due by 11/16/2023. Replies due by 11/24/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of KBF ISO mtn to Dismiss, #2 Affidavit CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION, #3 Exhibit DEFENDANTS CITY OF ARCATA AND KAREN DIEMERS REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT Exhibit 1-14)(Fox, Kathryn) (Filed on 11/2/2023) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party was also notified via email.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2023) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2023) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to City of Arcata, Karen Diemer. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2023) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 10/2/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order for Cases Asserting Denial of Right of Access under Americans with Disabilities Act. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2023) |
| #Electronic filing error. Summons is Blank. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety adding Name and Address of Defendants to be Served. Re: #3 Proposed Summons filed by Brett Watson (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/13/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Brett Watson . (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18693490.). Filed byBrett Watson. (Jambeck, Jay) (Filed on 9/29/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
