Fink v. One Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff: Joel Fink
Defendant: One Technologies, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv05086
Filed: October 4, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Edward M Chen
Referring Judge: Joseph C Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE by One Technologies, LLC Notice of Proof of Service of Notice of Entry of Order to Show Cause (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 11/7/2023)
November 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(2). Signed by Judge Chen on 11/3/2023. Responses due by 11/10/2023. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Copy mailed to plaintiff. Modified on 11/3/2023 (jlg, COURT STAFF).
October 30, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE by One Technologies, LLC Notice Of Non-Opposition To Defendant One Technologies, LLCs Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(2) (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/30/2023)
October 19, 2023 Filing 13 STATEMENT OF RECENT DECISION pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3.d Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Statement Of Recent Decision Related To Motion To Dismiss Pursuant To L.R. 7-3(D)(2) filed byOne Technologies, LLC. (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/19/2023)
October 13, 2023 Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING MOTION HEARING. Motion Hearing as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(2) set for 12/4/2023, at 9:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only before Judge Edward M Chen. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. ALL PARTIES PARTICIPATING IN THE HEARING ARE REQUIRED TO LOG INTO ZOOM NO LATER THAN 8:50 AM. THERE IS NO NEED FOR DEFENDANT TO REFILE THE MOTION AS DIRECTED AT [Dkt. #11].Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/emcGeneral Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.),(vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 13, 2023 Filing 11 CLERKS NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Edward M. Chen upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chens Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-filed by the moving party for a new hearing according to Judge Chens available dates, dates of unavailability are listed on his webpage under the section "Scheduling Notes." The new hearing date must be at least 35 days from the date the motion was re-filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2024, at 2:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. ALL COUNSEL PARTICIPATING IN THE HEARING ARE REQUIRED TO LOG INTO ZOOM NO LATER THAN 2:20 PMWebinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/emcGeneral Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Edward M Chen for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 10/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 12, 2023 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)copy placed in O:drive for mailing on 10/12/2023
October 12, 2023 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by One Technologies, LLC.. (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/12/2023)
October 11, 2023 Filing 7 Certificate of Interested Entities by One Technologies, LLC Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Certification Of Conflicts And Interested Entities Or Persons (Civil Local Rule 3-15) (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/11/2023)
October 11, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant To Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(B)(2) filed by One Technologies, LLC. Motion Hearing set for 11/17/2023 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom D, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Responses due by 10/25/2023. Replies due by 11/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Astra Zittlau In Support Of One Technologies, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2), #2 Proposed Order Granting Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Motion To Dismiss Complaint For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2))(Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/11/2023)
October 11, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE by One Technologies, LLC Defendant One Technologies, LLC's Notice of Compliance With 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Compliance)(Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/11/2023)
October 4, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/29/2023. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/5/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom D, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
October 4, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/18/2023. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2023)
October 4, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by One Technologies, LLC (Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/4/2023)
October 4, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marin County Superior Court. Their case number is CV0000781. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18706808). Filed byOne Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit 2 to Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit 3 to Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit 4 to Notice of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rothman, Ari) (Filed on 10/4/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fink v. One Technologies, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel Fink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Ari N. Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?