Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc.
| Enovsys LLC |
| Lyft, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv05157 |
| October 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Virginia K DeMarchi |
| Rita F Lin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 28
ORDER (with signature affixed) by Judge Rita F. Lin granting #25 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond and Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2023)
|
|
Filing 27
**Filed in error. Please refer to corrected order at docket no. #28 .** ORDER by Judge Rita F. Lin granting #25 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond and Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.(mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2023) Modified on 12/6/2023 (mkl, COURT STAFF).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Responses due by 12/22/2023. Replies due by 1/12/2024. Motion Hearing reset for 2/27/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 15, 18th Floor before Judge Rita F. Lin. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2023) |
| Filing 26 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 5:23-cv-04549-EJD. Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on 12/4/2023. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
| Filing 25 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Extending Time to Respond and Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 24) filed by Enovsys LLC. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines as to #24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Motion Hearing reset for 1/9/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 15, 18th Floor before Judge Rita F. Lin. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
| Filing 24 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Lyft, Inc.. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 1/9/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 15, 18th Floor. Responses due by 12/12/2023. Replies due by 12/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeremy J. Taylor, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
| Filing 23 Certificate of Interested Entities by Lyft, Inc. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley Shigezawa as Counsel for Lyft, Inc. (Shigezawa, Bradley) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Anne Burgess as Counsel for Lyft, Inc. (Burgess, Katherine) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
| Filing 20 Case Reassigned to Judge Rita F. Lin. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (kab, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2023) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE.IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned to the Honorable Rita F. Lin in the San Francisco Division for all further proceedings.1. All future filings shall bear the initials RFL immediately after the case number.2. All case management conference dates are vacated and will be reset by the Court.3. All hearing dates presently scheduled are VACATED. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. All pending motions (regardless of whether they are presently scheduled for hearing) must be RENOTICED for hearing before Judge Lin by the moving party for a date consistent with the Courts law and motion calendar, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule.4. Deadlines for ADR compliance and discovery cutoffs remain unchanged.5. All pretrial conference and trial dates currently set for after March 4, 2024, and all other deadlines associated with the case, will remain in place unless otherwise ordered.6. All pretrial conference and trial dates scheduled on or before March 4, 2024, are vacated. Other pretrial deadlines (eg., motions in limine, pretrial statements, proposed joint trial exhibits, etc.) will remain in place. The Court will notify the parties when a status conference will be held to schedule a new pretrial conference and trial dates for affected cases.7. Matters currently referred to a Magistrate Judge will remain before that Magistrate Judge absent further notice.8. Each party is expected to review and become familiar with all applicable standing orders and scheduling notes.9. On or before December 11, 2023, the parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement (separate statements are appropriate if either party is proceeding without counsel). The statement should not exceed ten pages in length and should address the following items in the following order: a. Date Filed: The date the case was filed; b. Parties: A list or description of each party; c. Claims: A summary of all claims, counter-claims, cross-claims, or third party claims; d. Facts: A brief chronology of the facts and a statement of the principal factual issues in dispute; e. Legal Issues: A brief statement, without extended legal argument, of the disputed points of law, including reference to specific statutes and decisions; f. Relief: A description of the relief sought and the damages claimed with an explanation as to how damages have been (or will be) computed; g. Discovery: The status of discovery, including any significant discovery management issues, as well as any limits or cutoff dates; h. Related Cases: The status, case name, and case number of any related cases or proceedings pending before another judge of this court, or before another court or administrative body; i. Procedural History: A procedural history of the case, including any previous motions that were decided or submitted, any ADR proceedings or settlement conferences that have been scheduled or concluded, any appellate proceedings that are pending or concluded, and any previous referral to a magistrate judge; j. Deadlines: A description of any other deadlines in place before reassignment, including those for ADR, dispositive motions, pretrial conferences, and trials; k. Any modification of deadlines: Any requested modification of these dates, and the reasons for the request; l. Consent to Magistrate: Whether the parties will consent to a magistrate judge for trial; and m. Emergency: Whether there exists an immediate need for a case management conference to be scheduled in the action, and why the parties believe such a need exists.10. The Joint Case Management Statement will not constitute a motion to extend or modify dates. If emergency relief is needed to modify a deadline, and the deadline is not of the type that can be modified via stipulation of the parties without a court order, the requesting party or parties shall additionally file a motion or stipulation for such relief in compliance with Local Rule 6.11. The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. Hearings and trials in any civil case assigned to a judge participating in the Pilot Project are eligible for video recording, upon request and with the consent of the parties and the presiding judge. Please see the #Northern Districts webpage about participation in the Pilot Project and # General Order 65 for more information. IT IS SO ORDERED.Dated: 11/27/2023FOR THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEEMark B. Busby, Clerk of Court (kab-adi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2023)
|
| Set Deadlines: Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs complaint by 11/28/2023. (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 11/3/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023)
|
| Filing 17 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint filed by Lyft, Inc.. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AFTER REASSIGNMENT. Case Management Statement due by 2/15/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/22/2024 11:00 AM before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tsh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2023) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi remains as referral judge assigned to case. Reassignment Order signed by Clerk on 10/25/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2023)
|
| Filing 14 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (amk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2023) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Lyft, Inc... (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 10/24/2023) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy J Taylor as Counsel for Lyft, Inc. (Taylor, Jeremy) (Filed on 10/24/2023) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Enovsys LLC.. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/18/2023) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Enovsys LLC. Lyft, Inc. served on 10/18/2023, answer due 11/8/2023. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/18/2023) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Lyft, Inc. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2023) |
| Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/2/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/9/2024 01:30 PM in San Jose, Courtroom 2, 5th Floor. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2023) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Stanley Hugh Thompson, Jr for Plaintiff Enovsys LLC (Thompson, Stanley) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Sandeep Seth for Plaintiff Enovsys LLC (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 5 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Enovsys LLC (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 4 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 6,441,752; 6,756,918; and 7,199,726 (cc: form mailed to register). (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/24/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement; Demand for Jury Trial against Lyft, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18721504.). Filed by Enovsys LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (Seth, Sandeep) (Filed on 10/10/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Enovsys LLC v. Lyft, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Enovsys LLC | |
| Represented By: | Sandeep Seth |
| Represented By: | Stanley Hugh Thompson, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lyft, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Bradley Shigezawa |
| Represented By: | Katherine Anne Burgess |
| Represented By: | Jeremy J Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
