Clements v. Ivory et al
| George Bernard Clements, Jr. |
| Milous James Ivory, Russell Alan Robinson, Laurie Solorzano and Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) |
| 3:2023cv05202 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
| Alex G Tse |
| Real Property: Other |
| 7 U.S.C. § 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE Remanding case to Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2023) |
Filing 22
Order by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin granting #8 Motion to Remand. (amolc2, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 12/8/2023)
|
| Filing 21 Statement of Non-Opposition re #20 Notice (Other) STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO AMENDED NOTICE RE: MOTION TO REMAND; JOINDER filed by Russell Alan Robinson. (Related document(s) #20 ) (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 12/1/2023) Modified on 12/4/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 20 AMENDED NOTICE OF MOTION by George Bernard Clements, Jr (Signorotti, Dominic) (Filed on 11/14/2023) Modified on 11/14/2023 (jml, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 19 Clerk's Notice on Reassignment. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing date on a Thursday afternoon at 2:00 PM. Please note, the earliest date for a motion hearing is 3/7/2023. The parties may be able to obtain an earlier hearing date by consenting to a magistrate judge using the form available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Case Management Statement due by 3/28/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/4/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2023) |
| Filing 18 Amended Statement of Non-Opposition re #17 Notice (Other) filed by Russell Alan Robinson. (Related document(s) #17 ) (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 11/7/2023) Modified on 11/7/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 17 Amended Notice of Motion and Motion To Remand by George Bernard Clements, Jr re #16 Order Reassigning Case, Case Assigned/Reassigned, (Signorotti, Dominic) (Filed on 11/7/2023) Modified on 11/7/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
|
Filing 16
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 11/7/23. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2023)
|
| Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2023) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Milous James Ivory. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2023) |
|
Filing 13
*** FILED IN WRONG CASE. PLEASE IGNORE. *** ORDER Referring Case to ADR Department for Mediation by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2023) Modified on 11/1/2023 (tmi, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 12 Amended Notice of Motion and Motion To Remand by George Bernard Clements, Jr. (Signorotti, Dominic) (Filed on 10/31/2023) Modified on 10/31/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
| CASE REFERRED to Mediation. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2023) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Motion Hearing set for 12/22/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2023) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by George Bernard Clements, Jr.. (Signorotti, Dominic) (Filed on 10/30/2023) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF Re: Consent or Declination. Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 11/3/2023. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2023) |
| Filing 9 Statement of Non-Opposition to Motion to Remand; Joinder re #8 First MOTION to Remand filed by Russell Alan Robinson. (Related document(s) #8 ) (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 10/28/2023) Modified on 10/30/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 8 First MOTION to Remand filed by George Bernard Clements, Jr. Motion Hearing set for 11/17/2023 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Responses due by 11/6/2023. Replies due by 11/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Tanner D. Brink, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Tanner Brink)(Brink, Tanner) (Filed on 10/27/2023) |
| Filing 7 REQUEST TO CORRECT/UPDATE CIVIL DOCKET by Russell Alan Robinson re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Dismissal of two defendants)(Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 10/14/2023) Modified on 10/16/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT OF NON-CONSENT TO REMOVAL re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Russell Alan Robinson. (Related document(s) #1 ) (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 10/14/2023) Modified on 10/16/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 10/14/2023) |
| Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Russell Alan Robinson.. (Robinson, Russell) (Filed on 10/14/2023) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/5/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/12/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023) |
| Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 311166370. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco. Their case number is CGC-21-596963. (Filing Fee $402.00 Receipt no.311166370). Filed by George Bernard Clements, Jr. Consent/Declination due by 10/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
