Murphy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Elunda Murphy |
| Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier LLC |
| 3:2023cv05224 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 Case transferred in from District of Illinois Northern; Case Number 1:23-cv-03425. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 3084: Opened in California Northern District as 3:23-cv-05224-CRB Murphy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al pursuant to Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2023) |
| Filing 30 TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California the electronic record. (jg, ) |
| Filing 28 Notice of Transfer Order by the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Elunda Murphy (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Transfer Order)(Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 29 TRANSFER ORDER from MDL Panel transferring case to Northern District of California. (jg, ) |
| ***Civil Case Terminated pursuant to MDL 3084 Transfer Order filed 10/4/2023. (jg, ) |
| Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: In light of the first amended complaint #26 filed on 8/17/23, motion to dismiss and strike #15 is denied as moot. Stay of proceedings #25 remains in place. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 26 FIRST AMENDED complaint by Elunda Murphy against All Defendants (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 25 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Telephonic status hearing held on 08/10/23. Counsel informed the Court that this case is currently under advisement before the MDL Panel for consideration for transfer to the Northern District of California pursuant to 28 USC 1407. Based on this representation, the Court grants plaintiff's motion to stay proceedings #21 . The 08/15/23 motion hearing is stricken. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.'s motion to dismiss and strike #15 shall be filed by 08/24/23; Defendants' reply, if any, shall be filed by 08/31/23. The Court reserves ruling on said motion #15 pending the potential transfer of this action by the MDL Judicial Panel. Once the MDL Panel issues a ruling, counsel shall inform the Court within 7 days by filing a status report. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Motion by Brandon Michael Wise for presentment of motion to stay #21 before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 8/15/2023 at 09:30 AM. (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 23 DECLARATION of Rachel Abrams regarding motion to stay #21 (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 22 MEMORANDUM by Elunda Murphy in support of motion to stay #21 (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 21 MOTION by Plaintiff Elunda Murphy to stay (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Hearing set for 8/10/23 at 9:30 a.m. is stricken. Status hearing set for 8/10/23 at 10:00 a.m. remains in place. (rbf, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by George Mario Velcich for presentment of motion to dismiss #15 before Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 8/10/2023 at 09:30 AM. (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 18 Proposed Order Granting Uber's Motion to Dismiss and Strike by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 17 Request for Judicial Notice by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION of George Velcich regarding motion to dismiss #15 and strike (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 15 MOTION by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. to dismiss and strike (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 14 MOTION of Plaintiffs for Transfer of Actions to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 for Coordinated or Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings. (lw, ) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Defendants' agreed motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead to plaintiff's complaint #11 is granted. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise plead is due on 8/4/2023. The telephonic status hearing set for 7/20/2023 is stricken and reset to 8/10/2023 at 10:00 a.m. For the telephonic status hearing, parties are to use the following call-in number: (888) 684 8852, conference code 8819984. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. COUNSEL MUST TYPE IN THEIR NAME WHEN JOINING THE CALL. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Mailed notice (mjc, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 11 MOTION by Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. for extension of time to Answer or Otherwise Plead (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. by George Mario Velcich (Velcich, George) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elunda Murphy as to Rasier, LLC on 6/9/2023, answer due 6/30/2023. (Perkins, Brian) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elunda Murphy as to Uber Technologies, Inc. on 6/9/2023, answer due 6/30/2023. (Perkins, Brian) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Telephonic status hearing set for 7/20/2023 at 11:00 a.m. For the telephonic status hearing, parties are to use the following call-in number: (888) 684 8852, conference code 8819984. Counsel of record will receive an email the morning of the telephonic hearing with instructions to join the call. COUNSEL MUST TYPE IN THEIR NAME WHEN JOINING THE CALL. Throughout the telephonic hearing, each speaker will be expected to identify themselves for the record before speaking. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| Filing 6 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras: Motion to appear pro hac vice #4 is granted.Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Rasier, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc. (evw, ) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elunda Murphy by Rachel Beth Abrams (Abrams, Rachel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number AILNDC-20690908. (Abrams, Rachel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elunda Murphy by Brian John Perkins (Perkins, Brian) |
| Filing 2 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Elunda Murphy by Brandon Michael Wise (Wise, Brandon) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Elunda Murphy; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20690628. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Wise, Brandon) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable M. David Weisman. Case assignment: Random assignment. (jcc, ) |
| CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached #Consent To# form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jcc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
