Hall v. County Of Monterey et al
Silvia Hall |
County Of Monterey, Tina Nieto, Sergeant Garrett Sanders, Jeff Hoyne, Sergeant Joseph Banuelos, Wellpath, LLC and Paul Francisco, M.D. |
3:2023cv05321 |
October 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Charles R Breyer |
Susan van Keulen |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Judge P. Casey Pitts no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
Filing 14 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #https://cand.uscourts.gov/notices/northern-district-extends-caseload-rebalancing-pilot-program/. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
Filing 13 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge P. Casey Pitts on 11/28/2023. (nmc, COURT USER) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Joseph Banuelos, Paul Francisco, M.D., Jeff Hoyne, Tina Nieto, Garrett Sanders, Wellpath, LLC. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
Filing 11 Proposed Summons. (Goldstein, Jamie) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
#Electronic filing error. Summons was previously issued to County of Monterey at docket entry #5 . The previously issued summons must be returned as unexecuted before a new summons can be issued. Additionally, the new summons contains the name of a party not listed in the complaint, Sheriff Steven Bernal, and will not be issued to this party. [err102] This filing will not be processed by the clerks office. Please re-file in its entirety Re: #10 Proposed Summons filed by Silvia Hall. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023) |
Filing 10 Proposed Summons. (Goldstein, Jamie) (Filed on 11/10/2023) |
Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOLLOWING REASSIGNMENT. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/4/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2024 at 01:00 PM before Judge P. Casey Pitts in San Jose, Courtroom 8, 4th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (nmc, COURT USER) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge P. Casey Pitts for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen no longer assigned to case, except for discovery purposes. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023) |
Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2024 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to County Of Monterey. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2023) |
Filing 4 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Silvia Hall.. (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 10/18/2023) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/1/2023. (bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2023) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 10/18/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (with jury demand) against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18750164). Filed by Silvia Hall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Sanguinetti, Elise) (Filed on 10/18/2023) Modified on 10/19/2023 (cjl, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.