Hill et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Ms. Geraldine Hill, Ms. Nichole Lenay Robinson and Ms. Charollette Alarcon |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America, Federal Correctional Institution-Dublin, Officer Espinosa, Officer Ramos and Officer Salcido |
| 3:2023cv05374 |
| October 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Rita F Lin |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UPON REASSIGNMENT: Notice is hereby given that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Rita F. Lin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Lin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-rita-f-rfl/. Case Management Statement due by 1/24/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/31/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/lin-rita-f-rfl/General Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2023) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Rita F. Lin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 12/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Charollette Alarcon, Geraldine Hill, Nichole Lenay Robinson.. (Wagner, Nicholas) (Filed on 12/1/2023) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 12/13/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/22/2023. (ejk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2023) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Federal Bureau of Prisons only, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2024 11:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom B, 15th Floor. (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/3/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Wagner, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18756996.). Filed byGeraldine Hill, Charollette Alarcon, Nichole Lenay Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wagner, Nicholas) (Filed on 10/20/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
