Espinosa v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
| Katie Espinosa |
| Uber Technologies Inc. and Rasier LLC |
| 3:2023cv05417 |
| October 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Charles R Breyer |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Case transferred in from District of Texas Northern; Case Number 3:23-cv-01519. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED MDL 3084: Northern District of Texas, 3:23-cv-01519-N, Espinosa v. Uber Technologies Inc et al, Opened in California Northern District as 3:23-cv-05417-CRB pursuant to Transfer Order cc: JPMDL (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2023) |
| Filing 14 Transfer Order: The JPML has issued the attached order in MDL 3084, and that order has now been filed in the Northern District of California. (ndt) |
| Filing 13 Joint STATUS REPORT Case Management Report filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. (Spencer, Luke) |
Filing 12
ORDER REQUIRING STATUS AND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE: The parties are directed to confer within 14 days of the date of this Order, and report to the Court within 14 days after the conference the parties' position. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 9/11/2023) (sxf)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Mon Sep 11 14:40:02 CDT 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 11 Appendix in Support filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Katie Espinosa's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (Spencer, Luke) |
| Filing 10 Request for Judicial Notice in Support filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc re #8 MOTION to Dismiss. (Spencer, Luke) Modified event and text on 9/13/2023 (sxf). |
| Filing 9 Brief/Memorandum in Support (Memorandum of Law in Support) filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc re #8 MOTION to Dismiss (Spencer, Luke) Modified text on 9/13/2023 (sxf). |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Katie Espinosa's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Spencer, Luke) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Defendants Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLCs response to the complaint is due September 8, 2023. (Ordered by Chief District Judge David C Godbey on 8/9/2023) (chmb) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Luke Charles Spencer added to party Rasier LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Luke Charles Spencer added to party Uber Technologies Inc(pty:dft) (Spencer, Luke) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Spencer, Luke) |
| Filing 4 Court Request for Recusal: Senior Judge A. Joe Fish recused. Pursuant to instruction in Special Order 3-249, the Clerk has reassigned the case to Chief District Judge David C Godbey for all further proceedings. Future filings should indicate the case number as: 3:23-cv-1519-N. (axm) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Rasier LLC, Uber Technologies Inc. (agc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (agc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Katie Espinosa. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-13867330) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Stanley, Bret) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
