Ford v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
| Shirley Ford |
| Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., McKesson Corporation, Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc, Actavis LLC, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc, sanofi-aventis U.S LLC, Sandoz Inc., Accord Healthcare, Inc., McKesson Packaging, Hospira Worldwide, Inc., Hospira Inc, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd., Pfizer Inc, Actavis Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc |
| 3:2023cv05629 |
| October 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Maxine M Chesney |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by David Polyakov (Polyakov, David) (Filed on 12/18/2023) |
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/16/2024 at 10:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor.Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/9/2024. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 11/16/2023. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2023)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Maxine M. Chesney for all further proceedings. Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 11/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bar, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2023)
|
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2023) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Sanofi U.S. Services Inc., sanofi-aventis U.S LLC.. (Weiler, Eva Marie) (Filed on 11/15/2023) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 11/15/2023. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2023) |
| Filing 9 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/24/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/31/2024 01:30 PM. (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/1/2023) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of Louisiana Eastern; Case Number 2:19-cv-13804. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 7
TRANSFER ORDER - Case transferred to Northern District of California. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo on 10/23/2023. (Filed at Doc. 16511, MDL 2740)(sa)
|
| Filing 6 Joint Designation of Record for MDL Transfer by Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC. JOINT DESIGNATION OF GENERAL AND CASE-SPECIFIC MDL RECORDS TO BE INCLUDED UPON REMAND (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Ratliff, Harley) |
| Filing 5 First AMENDED COMPLAINT by Shirley Ford. (Elliott, John) |
|
Filing 4
PRETRIAL ORDERS. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo.(am)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Hospira, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Pfizer Inc., Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons)(ss) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Accord Healthcare, Inc., Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Hospira Worldwide, LLC, Hospira, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Pfizer Inc., Sagent Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz Inc., Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC, Sun Pharma Global FZE, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number ALAEDC-7992479) filed by Shirley Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Summons, #10 Summons, #11 Summons, #12 Summons, #13 Summons, #14 Summons)Attorney John Christopher Elliott added to party Shirley Ford(pty:pla).(Elliott, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
