Thongvilay v. Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office et al
| Pamot Thongvilay |
| Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and United States Attorney General |
| 3:2023cv05724 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Sallie Kim |
| PSLC SJT |
| Trina L Thompson |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail sent to Pamot Thongvilay returned as undeliverable re #8 Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment. Mail Returned; response required by 3/4/2024. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2024) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Trina L Thompson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 7 Erroneous entry, please disregard. Issued prematurely. Summons Issued as to Director, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Attorney General, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) Modified on 12/5/2023 (gba, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 6 Copy of docket sheet from USDC, Eastern District of California. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher D. Baker on 11/16/2023. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2023)
|
| Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in Eastern District of California - Live System as case 1:23-cv-01605, filed 11/14/2023. (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2023) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by Judge Sallie Kim on 11/9/2023. (sklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 311166656. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/9/2023) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00.). Filed by Pamot Thongvilay. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
