Hirlinger et al v. WP Company LLC
| Joseph Hirlinger and Guy Ball |
| WP Company LLC |
| 3:2023cv05963 |
| November 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Araceli Martinez-Olguin |
| Donna M Ryu |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Transfer Case or in the alternative,, MOTION to Dismiss filed by WP Company LLC. Motion Hearing set for 3/14/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. Responses due by 1/19/2024. Replies due by 1/26/2024. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 3/14/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anjali Iyer, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Request for Judicial Notice, #5 Proposed Order)(Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
| Filing 11 Clerk's Notice on Reassignment. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. Case Management Statement due by 3/7/2024 no later than 12:00 PM PST. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/14/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to address the court or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at amocrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 3/12/2024 at 12:00 PM PST. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 12/1/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (kc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by WP Company LLC.. (Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
|
Filing 7
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu granting #6 Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time ***AS MODIFIED***. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2023)
|
| Filing 6 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to extend time to respond to Complaint pursuant to LR 6-1(a) and to change motion response time under LR 6-1(b) and 6-2 filed by WP Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 11/21/2023) |
| Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/21/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by WP Company LLC (Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/1/2023. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
| Filing 2 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by WP Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Anjali Iyer, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Exhibit Redacted version of Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit Unredacted version of Exhibit D)(Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Francisco Sup. Ct.. Their case number is CGC-23-609585. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18848737). Filed by WP Company LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pan, Sheri) (Filed on 11/17/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
