Palmer v. Pacific Service Credit Union et al
Plaintiff: Sheryl Palmer
Defendant: Pacific Service Credit Union, Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Equifax Information Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv06132
Filed: November 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2023 Filing 4 Defendant Pacific Service Credit Union's Answer to Complaint ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Pacific Service Credit Union. (Betpera, Artin) (Filed on 12/5/2023) Modified on 12/6/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).
November 28, 2023 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/27/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023)
November 28, 2023 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/12/2023. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2023)
November 27, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand from Contra Costa Superior Court. Their case number is L23-05514. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18871737). Filed by Pacific Service Credit Union. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Betpera, Artin) (Filed on 11/27/2023) Modified on 11/28/2023 (anj, COURT STAFF).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palmer v. Pacific Service Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheryl Palmer
Represented By: Stanley R Apps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pacific Service Credit Union
Represented By: Artin Betpera
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equifax Information Services, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?