Roe CL 7 et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 8, Jane Roe CL 9 and Jane Roe CL 10
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Raiser-CA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive, Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC and Raiser-CA, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv06149
Filed: November 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles R Breyer
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DEEMING MOOT MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/5/2024. Associated Cases: See Order. (crblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2024)
January 4, 2024 Filing 16 Case Reassigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER RELATING CASES. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/3/2024. (crblc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2024)
December 28, 2023 Filing 14 Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship of Cases re 23-md-3084. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on 12/28/2023. (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2023)
December 28, 2023 Filing 13 Clerk's Notice on Reassignment. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. All pending motions will be taken off-calendar and must be re-noticed by the moving party for a new hearing date on a Thursday afternoon at 2:00 PM. The new hearing date must be at least five weeks from the date the motion was filed and at least three weeks from the date the re-notice is filed. The Court's earliest motion date is in April 2024. The parties may be able to obtain an earlier hearing date by consenting to a magistrate judge using the form available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. The due date for any opposition or reply papers not yet filed shall be calculated in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3. Case Management Statement due by 3/28/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/4/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2023)
December 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 12/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2023)
December 27, 2023 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2023)
December 27, 2023 Filing 10 NOTICE by Jane Roe CL 10, Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 8, Jane Roe CL 9 of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding (Cutter, Celine) (Filed on 12/27/2023)
December 27, 2023 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jane Roe CL 10, Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 8, Jane Roe CL 9.. (Cutter, Celine) (Filed on 12/27/2023)
December 13, 2023 Filing 8 CLERK'S FIRST NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 12/27/2023. (jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2023)
December 4, 2023 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC, Uber Technologies, Inc.. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION for Protective Order and Leave to Proceed Anonymously filed by Jane Roe CL 10, Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 8, Jane Roe CL 9. Responses due by 12/15/2023. Replies due by 12/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Domer, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Domer, Jennifer) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
November 30, 2023 #Electronic filing error. Please submit only ONE summons for all Defendants. No summons are issued to Does. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file in its entirety. Re: #2 Proposed Summons filed by Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 8, Jane Roe CL 9, Jane Roe CL 10 (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2023)
November 29, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/6/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, Courtroom 4, 3rd Floor. (kmg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023)
November 29, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/13/2023. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023)
November 28, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Domer, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/28/2023)
November 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Raiser-CA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18875839.). Filed by Jane Roe CL 7, Jane Roe CL 10, Jane Roe CL 9, Jane Roe CL 8. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Domer, Jennifer) (Filed on 11/28/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Roe CL 7 et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 7
Represented By: Jennifer Sylvia Domer
Represented By: Celine Emily Cutter
Represented By: Curtis Brooks Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 8
Represented By: Jennifer Sylvia Domer
Represented By: Celine Emily Cutter
Represented By: Curtis Brooks Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 9
Represented By: Jennifer Sylvia Domer
Represented By: Celine Emily Cutter
Represented By: Curtis Brooks Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jane Roe CL 10
Represented By: Jennifer Sylvia Domer
Represented By: Celine Emily Cutter
Represented By: Curtis Brooks Cutter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raiser, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raiser-CA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raiser, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raiser-CA, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?