Oliveira v. National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC
| Suzanne Oliveira |
| National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC |
| 3:2023cv06157 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Certificate of Interested Entities by Suzanne Oliveira (Siruno, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Suzanne Oliveira.. (Siruno, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
| Filing 12 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Suzanne Oliveira. (Siruno, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/15/2023) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Siruno (Siruno, Elizabeth) (Filed on 12/14/2023) |
Filing 10
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/29/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2024. Signed by Judge James Donato on 12/14/2024. (lrc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 12/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(anj, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2023) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC.. (Aparicio, Josue) (Filed on 12/11/2023) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Certificate of Filing and Service of Notice to State Court and Adverse Party of Removal (Liu, Dorothy) (Filed on 12/6/2023) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Dorothy Sheng-Ing Liu for Defendant National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (Liu, Dorothy) (Filed on 12/6/2023) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/20/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/27/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/13/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2023) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Honeywell International, Inc., Other Affiliate National Nuclear Security Administration for National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC. (Aparicio, Josue) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Under 28 USC 1331 (Federal Question) from Alameda County Superior Court. Their case number is 23CV047599. (Filing fee $402 receipt number ACANDC-18877283). Filed by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Certificate/Proof of Service, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Aparicio, Josue) (Filed on 11/28/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
