Ioffe v. 23andMe, Inc.
| Polina Ioffe |
| 23andMe, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv06205 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Edward M Chen |
| Nathanael M Cousins |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE VACATING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The Court HEREBY VACATES the Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2024. The Initial Case Management Conference will be reset 30 days after the Court rules on Defendant's filed Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Transfer by the JPML. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2024) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE - REASSIGNED CASE - NOTICE OF NEW HEARING DATE. You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Edward M. Chen upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Chens Standing Orders and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/16/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/23/2024, at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar. ALL COUNSEL PARTICIPATING IN THE HEARING ARE REQUIRED TO LOG INTO ZOOM NO LATER THAN 1:10 PM. THIS CASE WILL BE HEARD FIRST.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/emcGeneral Order 58. Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/zoom/. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2024) |
| Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Judge Edward M Chen. Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins no longer assigned to the case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2024) |
Filing 8
ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/12/2024. (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/12/2024)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE by 23andMe, Inc. Notice of Filing of Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of 23ANDME, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Certificate/Proof of Service Proof of Service)(Ballon, Ian) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Polina Ioffe. Service waived by 23andMe, Inc. waiver sent on 12/5/2023, answer due 2/5/2024. (Schubert, Amber) (Filed on 12/12/2023) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 23andMe, Inc.. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/21/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/28/2024 10:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 5, 4th Floor. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2023) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/15/2023. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Schubert, Amber) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against 23andMe, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACANDC-18890742.). Filed by Polina Ioffe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration CLRA Venue Declaration of Plaintiffs Counsel Pursuant to California Civil Code Sec. 1780(d))(Schubert, Amber) (Filed on 11/30/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ioffe v. 23andMe, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Polina Ioffe | |
| Represented By: | Amber Love Schubert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 23andMe, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Ian Ballon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
