Jones et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
Plaintiff: Monay Jones and Matthew Ridgway
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC
Case Number: 3:2023cv06211
Filed: December 1, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Thomas S Hixson
Referring Judge: Araceli Martinez-Olguin
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 26, 2024 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Roges (Roges, Jennifer) (Filed on 1/26/2024)
January 26, 2024 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan M. Cooney (Cooney, Megan) (Filed on 1/26/2024)
January 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING #13 Stipulation to Continue Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines. Case Management Statement due by noon on 4/4/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/18/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on January 24, 2024. (amolc1, COURTSTAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2024)
January 23, 2024 Filing 13 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference and Related Deadlines filed by Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Magallanes, Katie) (Filed on 1/23/2024)
December 28, 2023 Filing 12 STIPULATION re #1 Complaint to Extend Time to Respond filed by Amazon.com Services, LLC. (Magallanes, Katie) (Filed on 12/28/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Monay Jones, Matthew Ridgway. Amazon.com Services, LLC served on 12/19/2023, answer due 1/9/2024. (Markham, David) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Monay Jones, Matthew Ridgway re #1 Complaint, #5 Summons Issued (Markham, David) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 20, 2023 #Electronic filing error.Incorrect event used. [err101]Please re-file in its entirety as Summons Returned Executed. Re: #10 Certificate of Service filed by Monay Jones, Matthew Ridgway (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2023)
December 18, 2023 Filing 9 Clerk's Notice on Reassignment. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at #https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 3/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 10, 19th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ads, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2023)
December 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)
December 15, 2023 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2023)
December 15, 2023 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Monay Jones, Matthew Ridgway.. (Markham, David) (Filed on 12/15/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amazon.com Services, LLC. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: This case may fall within the Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. See #General Order 71. Parties and Counsel are directed to review General Order 71 to determine whether it applies to this case, and to comply with that General Order if applicable. Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/29/2024 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/15/2023. (cjl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Markham, David) (Filed on 12/1/2023)
December 1, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Amazon.com Services LLC ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-18893467.). Filed by Monay Jones, Matthew Ridgway. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Markham, David) (Filed on 12/1/2023)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones et al v. Amazon.com Services LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monay Jones
Represented By: David Roger Markham
Represented By: Lisa Rose Brevard
Represented By: Maggie K. Realin
Represented By: Walter Haines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Ridgway
Represented By: David Roger Markham
Represented By: Lisa Rose Brevard
Represented By: Maggie K. Realin
Represented By: Walter Haines
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amazon.com Services, LLC
Represented By: Jennifer Roges
Represented By: Katie Magallanes
Represented By: Megan M. Cooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?