Liberty Insurance Corporation et al v. DeMartini et al
| Liberty Insurance Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company |
| DeMartini Peter, DeMartini Diane, Garth David, Phommavongsay Phoutthasone, Peter DeMartini, Diane DeMartini, David Garth and Phoutthasone Phommavongsay |
| 3:2023cv06577 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Service waived by Phoutthasone Phommavongsay waiver sent on 1/5/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. (Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 2/5/2024) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. Service waived by David Garth waiver sent on 1/5/2024, answer due 3/5/2024. (Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 2/5/2024) |
| Filing 12 CLERK'S NOTICE RE REASSIGNED CASE: You are notified that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/28/2024 10:00 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg upon reassignment. Case Management Statement due by 3/21/2024. All parties shall appear by videoconference using log-in instructions the Court will provide in advance. For a copy of Judge Seeborg's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at www.cand.uscourts.gov (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Diane DeMartini, Peter DeMartini, David Garth, Phoutthasone Phommavongsay. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024) |
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros no longer assigned to case. Signed by Clerk on 1/4/2024. (mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024)
|
| #Electronic filing error. Incorrect PDF attached. [err201] No further action is necessary. Re: #5 Proposed Summons. Submit one summons listing all defendants. Attach additional pages if needed, not additional summons forms. Corrected by Clerk's Office. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2024) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.. (Sveslosky, Scott) (Filed on 1/3/2024) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott Russell Sveslosky (Sveslosky, Scott) (Filed on 12/26/2023) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2024 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom G, 15th Floor. (sec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 1/5/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc. for Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. and Certification of Conflicts and Interested Entities or Persons (Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 12/21/2023) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company . (Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 12/21/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND RESTITUTION against Garth David, DeMartini Diane, DeMartini Peter, Phommavongsay Phoutthasone ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-18964240.). Filed by Liberty Insurance Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Sanders, Robert) (Filed on 12/21/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
