Axle Logistics, LLC v. Axl Logistics Inc.
Axle Logistics, LLC |
Axl Logistics Inc. |
3:2023cv06596 |
December 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Trina L Thompson |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order GRANTING #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice as to Scott M. Douglass. Signed by Judge Trina L Thompson on 1/24/2024. (rfm, COURT USER) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Attorney Scott M. Douglass ( Filing fee $ 328, receipt number ACANDC-19052900.) filed by Axle Logistics, LLC. (Douglass, Scott) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Axle Logistics, LLC re #4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines, #6 Summons Issued, #1 Complaint, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities, 3 Case Assigned by Intake,, (Wagner, Brian) (Filed on 1/18/2024) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Axl Logistics Inc. (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2024) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons. (Wagner, Brian) (Filed on 1/8/2024) |
Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/21/2024 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 09, 19th Floor. (lsk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2023) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Trina L Thompson. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Axle Logistics, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Drew Johnson, Other Affiliate Jon Clay for Axle Logistics, LLC. re #1 Complaint (Wagner, Brian) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Axl Logistics Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-18966475.). Filed by Axle Logistics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wagner, Brian) (Filed on 12/22/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Axle Logistics, LLC v. Axl Logistics Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Axle Logistics, LLC | |
Represented By: | Brian John Wagner |
Represented By: | Scott M. Douglass |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Axl Logistics Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.