Michel v. Barroso et al
| Ramon Michel |
| J. Barroso and J. Gomez |
| 3:2023cv06626 |
| December 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Laurel Beeler |
| PSLC MBI |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ramon Michel.. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2024) |
| Filing 5 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Ramon Michel. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2024) |
| Filing 4 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Ramon Michel. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2024) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by e-mail |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ramon Michel, CDCR # AN3365.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2023) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against J. Barroso, J. Gomez. Filed by Ramon Michel. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2023) Modified on 1/3/2024 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
