In re DMCA Subpoena to X Corp. dba Twitter
| Cognosphere Pte. Ltd. |
| In re DMCA Subpoena to X Corp. dba Twitter |
| X Corp. dba Twitter |
| 3:2023mc80294 |
| November 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Peter H Kang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Issued Subpoena (sfb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2023) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/20/2023. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
| Filing 1 MISCELLANEOUS MATTER: In re DMCA Subpoena to X Corp. dba Twitter ( Filing fee $ 49, receipt number ACANDC-18810137.). Filed by Cognosphere Pte. Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of James Berkley, #2 Proposed Subpoena to be Issued)(Berkley, James) (Filed on 11/6/2023) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
