Mirshokri v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Shannon Mirshokri
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation, California Physicians Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, Eyemed Vision Care, LLC and California Physicians Service doing business as Blue Shield of California
Case Number: 3:2024cv00387
Filed: January 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 Filing 9 CLERK'S THIRD NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff Shannon Mirshokri shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 4/5/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2024)
March 6, 2024 Filing 8 CLERK'S SECOND NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 3/20/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendant EyeMed Vision Care, LLC by Shannon Mirshokri (Lyon, Joseph) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 9, 2024 Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/23/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2024)
January 26, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to California Physicians Service, Eyemed Vision Care, LLC, Progress Software Corporation. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/26/2024)
January 24, 2024 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. (Lyon, Joseph) (Filed on 1/24/2024)
January 24, 2024 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/15/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/22/2024 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2024)
January 23, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/6/2024. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2024)
January 23, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against California Physicians Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, Eyemed Vision Care, LLC, Progress Software Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ACANDC-19049007.). Filed by Shannon Mirshokri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lyon, Joseph) (Filed on 1/23/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mirshokri v. Progress Software Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Mirshokri
Represented By: Joseph M Lyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Physicians Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eyemed Vision Care, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Physicians Service doing business as Blue Shield of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?