Reybol v. OnTrac Logistics et al
| Arcelio Joseph Reybol |
| OnTrac Logistics and WorkWhile |
| 3:2024cv00389 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| James Donato |
| Thomas S Hixson |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge James Donato for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Clerk on 03/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Criminal Cover Sheet)(mbc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
| Filing 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 3/19/2024. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/21/2024 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 3/7/2024. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 2/26/2024. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson denying #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. By no later than February 21, 2024, Plaintiff shall either file a complete IFP application or pay the filing fee. If Plaintiff does not file a complete IFP application or pay the filing fee by February 21, 2024, the Court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
|
| Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/18/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/25/2024 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2024) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Arcelio Joseph Reybol. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2024) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OnTrac Logistics, WorkWhile. IFPP. No Process. Filed by Arcelio Joseph Reybol. Consent/Declination due by 2/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
