Das v. Smith, et al
Damodar Chandra Das |
Oak Smith, Correctional Officer Civongx, Correctional Officer Perez and Correctional Officer Smith |
3:2024cv00447 |
January 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Thomas S Hixson |
PSLC MWD |
Richard Seeborg |
Prisoner: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg Granting #8 leave to file amended complaint; Denying #10 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Amended Complaint due by 4/2/2024. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 11 ORDER GRANTING #2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/22/2024. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Damodar Chandra Das. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024) |
Filing 9 Received Proposed Summons by Damodar Chandra Das. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint filed by Damodar Chandra Das. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2024) |
Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Damodar Chandra Das. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2024) |
Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Richard Seeborg for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson no longer assigned to case,. Signed by Clerk on 2/1/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO REASSIGN ACTION signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/31/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Service Label/Proof of Service)(rmm2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 2/15/2024 (ljf, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 4 Prison Trust Fund Account Statement by Damodar Chandra Das. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2024) |
Filing 3 Notice of Assignment of Prisoner Case to Magistrate Judge. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2024) Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by Email to San Quentin State Prison) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Damodar Chandra DAS, CDCR # AV6366.The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is directed to submit within 72 hours and in PDF form a certified Prison Trust Account statement for the plaintiff, reflecting the last six months activity, to cdcrfilings@cand.uscourts.gov. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2024) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT by a Prisoner Under the Civil Rights Act against Civongx, Perez, Smith, Oak Smith (Filing fee IFPP). Filed by Damodar Chandra DAS. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2024) |
Copy of Docket Sheet and docket no. #3 Notice of Assignment emailed to plaintiff at San Quentin State Prison. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.