Sifuentes v. Twitter, Inc.
Plaintiff: David Angel Sifuentes, III
Defendant: Twitter, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2024cv00590
Filed: January 29, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Sallie Kim
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 13, 2024 Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by David Angel Sifuentes, III. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 8 MOTION to Strike Exhibit filed by David Angel Sifuentes, III. Responses due by 3/27/2024. Replies due by 4/3/2024. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL against Twitter, Inc.. Filed by David Angel Sifuentes, III. (tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 13, 2024 Filing 6 Letter dated 3/7/2024 from David Angel Sifuentes, III. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2024)
March 5, 2024 Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 3/19/2024. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
February 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and Screening Complaint. Amended Pleadings due by 4/5/2024. (bxl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 29, 2024 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 4/22/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/29/2024 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
January 29, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by David Angel Sifuentes, III. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2024)
January 29, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Twitter, Inc. (Filing fee: IFPP). Filed by David Angel Sifuentes, III. Consent/Declination due by 2/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter, #3 Envelope)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sifuentes v. Twitter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Angel Sifuentes, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Twitter, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?