Bartley v. Monsanto Company
| Sharon Bartley |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2024cv00734 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Sharon Bartley] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/12/2024) |
| Filing 12 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Sharon Bartley] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/12/2024) |
| Filing 11 Defendant Monsanto Company ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Sharon Bartley] by Monsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 3/12/2024) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua Rhett Harris on behalf of Plaintiff Sharon Bartley (Harris, Joshua) (Filed on 2/29/2024) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Cristina Murillo on behalf of Plaintiff (Murillo, Cristina) (Filed on 2/23/2024) |
| Filing 8 Case transferred in from District of North Carolina Eastern; Case Number 5:23-cv-00712. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED:, North Carolina Eastern, 5:23-cv-00712, Bartley v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-00734-VC cc: JPMDL (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2024) |
| Filing 7 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER - Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. Signed by Clerk of the Panel, Tiffaney D. Pete, on 2/7/2024. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 6 Document: Text Minute Order - As stipulated in Rule 7.1(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, transmittal of the order has been stayed 7 days to give any party an opportunity to oppose the transfer. The 7-day period has now elapsed, no opposition was received, and the order is directed to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the N.D. California for filing. The Panel governing statute, 28 U.S.C. 1407, requires that the transferee clerk transmit a certified copy of the Panel order to transfer to the clerk of the district court from which the action is being transferred. Signed by Clerk of the Panel Tiffaney D. Pete on 2/7/2024. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 5 Document: Email of Text Order from Tiffaney D. Pete, Clerk of the Panel, regarding MDL 2741 advising our court of the conditional transfer order filed by the Panel and inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. (Collins, S) |
| Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. File transmitted electronically. (Collins, S) |
| Case Selected for Mediation - A printable list of certified mediators for the Eastern District of North Carolina is available on the court's Website, http://www.nced.uscourts.gov/attorney/mediators.aspx. Please serve this list on all parties. (Collins, S) |
| Filing 4 Financial Disclosure Statement by Sharon Bartley (Whitley, Benjamin) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (*NOTICE: Counsel shall print the attached summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4.*) (Rudd, D.) |
| Filing 2 Notice of Appearance filed by Benjamin H. Whitley on behalf of Sharon Bartley. (Whitley, Benjamin) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monsanto Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ANCEDC-7392141.), filed by Sharon Bartley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Whitley, Benjamin) |
| NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Sharon Bartley. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bartley v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sharon Bartley | |
| Represented By: | BENJAMIN H. WHITLEY |
| Represented By: | Cristina Murillo |
| Represented By: | Joshua Rhett Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
