Lagrisola v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
| Luis Lagreo Rojas Lagrisola |
| Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00913 |
| February 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| William H Orrick |
| Kandis A Westmore |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER - Case Management Conference set for 6/4/2024 02:00 PM via Videoconference. Case Management Statement due by 5/28/2024. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/02/2024. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2024)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge William H. Orrick for all further proceedings. Judge Charles R. Breyer no longer assigned to case, Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras.. Signed by Clerk on 4/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on April 1, 2024. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned using a proportionate, random, and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore no longer assigned to case. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by The Clerk on 3/29/2024. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(wsm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/29/2024)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC.. (Stuhlbarg, Richard) (Filed on 3/28/2024) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Luis Lagreo Rojas Lagrisola.. (Berghoudian, Alessia) (Filed on 3/26/2024) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: #http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. Consent/Declination due by 3/28/2024. (wft, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2024) |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC identifying Other Affiliate Jaguar Land Rover Limited for Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (Chung, Michael) (Filed on 2/19/2024) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/14/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/21/2024 01:30 PM in Oakland, - To be determined. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC OF INTERESTED PARTIES (Chung, Michael) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/29/2024. (bw, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
| Filing 1 Answer to Removal Complaint, See Attachment #3 Exhibit C within Notice of Removal by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC. (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
| #Electronic filing error. ***Incorrect event used. [err101] Please re-file in its entirety, using the event: "Certificate of Interested Entities". Filer will need to add all interested parties into ECF. Re-file and when prompted, enter all affiliates or corporate parents. Additionally, the name of the court listed for this filing is incorrect. This case is being held within the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Please correct before re-filing.*** Re: #3 Notice (Other) filed by Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC (krp, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2024) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
