Meisner v. Monsanto Company
| Jon Meisner |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2024cv00941 |
| February 16, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Jon Meisner] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 2/20/2024) |
| Filing 9 Certificate of Interested Entities by Monsanto Company identifying Other Affiliate Bayer AG for Monsanto Company. [RE: Plaintiff Jon Meisner] (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 2/20/2024) |
| Filing 8 Defendant Monsanto Company ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand [RE: Plaintiff Jon Meisner] by Monsanto Company. (Walker-Stubbs, Jennise) (Filed on 2/20/2024) |
| Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Minnesota; Case Number 0:24-cv-00227. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Filing 6 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE: This case has been transferred/extracted to the Northern District of California. (kt) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFIED COPY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-442) transferring case to the Northern District of California per the MDL Panel for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. Case assigned to Judge Vince Chhabria.(kt) |
| MEMBER CASE OPENED:, Minnesota, 0:24-cv-00227, Meisner v. Monsanto Company, Opened in California Northern District as 3:24-cv-00941-VC pursuant to Conditional Transfer Order 442 cc: JPMDL (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2024) |
| Filing 4 Clerk's Notice to JPML regarding case potentially related to MDL #2741 re: #1 Complaint. (MMG) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (MMG) |
| Filing 2 (Text-Only) CLERK'S NOTICE OF INITIAL CASE ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Katherine M. Menendez per 3rd/4th Master list, referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. Please use case number 24-cv-227 KMM/ECW.Notice: All Nongovernmental Corporate Parties must file a #Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement. (MMG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jon Meisner (filing fee $ 405, receipt number AMNDC-10804318) filed by Jon Meisner. Filer requests summons issued. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Zimmerman, Genevieve) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Meisner v. Monsanto Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jon Meisner | |
| Represented By: | Genevieve M. Zimmerman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Monsanto Company | |
| Represented By: | Jennise Walker-Stubbs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
