Strong et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Michelle Strong and Lasalle Strong, Jr.
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 3:2024cv01130
Filed: February 23, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Alex G Tse
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2024 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shy, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2024)
February 29, 2024 Filing 8 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 5/17/2024. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/24/2024 at 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom A, 15th Floor. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/29/2024)
February 28, 2024 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 2/28/2024)
February 26, 2024 Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/11/2024. (ark, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2024)
February 23, 2024 Answer to Removed Complaint (see document #1 -11) filed by Ford Motor Company. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Pollard Vilchez (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Vilchez, Katherine) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Trina Marie Clayton (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Other Affiliate Black ROck, Inc. and certain affiliates, Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group and certain affiliates, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A. (fiduciary of the Ford defined contribution plans), Other Affiliate Side Street Corporation (parent of State Street Bank and Trust Company, which is the trustee of the FOrd defined contribution plans) for Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 2/23/2024)
February 23, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Contra Costa County Superior Court. Their case number is C23-03002. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ACANDC-19155205). Filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Atty iso Removal, #2 Exhibit A to Atty Decl, #3 Exhibit B to Atty Decl, #4 Exhibit C to Atty Decl, #5 Exhibit D to Atty Decl, #6 Exhibit E to Atty Decl, #7 Exhibit F to Atty Decl, #8 Supplement G to Atty Decl, #9 Exhibit H to Atty Decl, #10 Exhibit I to Atty Decl, #11 Exhibit J to Atty Decl, #12 Exhibit K to Atty Decl, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Clayton, Trina) (Filed on 2/23/2024)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Strong et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Strong
Represented By: Vincent Michael Onorio
Represented By: LaDawna Fleckenstein
Represented By: Kimberli Charleen Zazzi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lasalle Strong, Jr.
Represented By: LaDawna Fleckenstein
Represented By: Kimberli Charleen Zazzi
Represented By: Vincent Michael Onorio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Katherine Pollard Vilchez
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Trina Marie Clayton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?